The judge considers it probable that Cristina sent her daughter Yaiza to take revenge on her father and discard the mental confusion

Connected media – Linked media

Guilty of a asesinate with alevosia. By unanimity. It is the verdict of the contra juror Christina, the woman who, on May 31, 2021, met 4-year-old Yaiza on hija in Sant Joan Despí (Barcelona) and then attempted suicide. She also didn’t get it. She hizo, según considered probado el tribunal del jurado, para come from his expareja and father of the little girl, Sergio. Descartan thus, as he pointed out his defense, that comestiese the crime affected by a mental disorder or by insurmountable pain. He was in favor, even unanimously, to the point that he applied an attenuator, the analogical confession because it was withheld, he admitted the errors and also gave the telephone keys to the investigators.

The fiscal, Félix Martín, showed his non-conformity, since this aspect could imply a possible correction of the sentence. Both the public ministry and the particular accusation requested by Cristina reviewable permanent prison. Her abogadas pedían on her absolución, to the extent that her mother was not in her cabales when she gave birth to the little girl. The judge discarded these aforementioned possibilities, based not only on the forensic dictamen, which suggests that the woman knew what she had, because she now suffers from severe depression; yes, even in this Cristina has been planning the asinine over the months.

This will confirm the searches made from your mobile phone. First I started with love affairs, because I wanted to get back with his expareja, who had started a new relationship with another woman. Then I informed the pharmacists – she worked in the shop of a clinic in Barcelona – and the suicides about sobredosis. Tras ello, sobre asesinatos de menores at the hands of his progenitors or parejas de éstos, as the case of Gabriel Cruz, or los de José Bretón or Tomás Gimeno.

So, in fear of the crime, he took his hija to ride his bicycle and then go to dinner at a fast food place. They returned home and, already in the room, she administered two sedants to the little girl Yaiza. «To the truth that no effect had been achieved», the lawyer’s spokesperson pointed out this late, «I decided to asphyxiate her». The little girl dispersed, and she even made an attempt to defend herself. Ambas estaban solas. The maternal abuela had abandoned the house where the three lived together on the morning of May 31st. Therefore the judge also considered the aggravating circumstance proven alevosia.

After killing your daughter, Cristina made several calls. First to the colegio de la pequeña, to warn that I would not be attending class. Luego to her own work, to explain that she would soon feel the pressure of her. After going up the street to walk to the tree, when I returned home she took about 90 pills, according to her report, to try to stop her life.

It was the child’s father, who shared custody with him on alternating weeks, who, late, alerted, called to his maternal child, because Yaiza I hadn’t heard at school. Cristina’s mother, when she came back to life, met her daughter and granddaughter’s body in her room. I thought those people were dead, but in the end the Medical Emergency Service (SEM) was asked to resuscitate the tirade who, in the same neighborhood, had abandoned various shipping cards and contains empty medicines.

On the basis of these misivas, the juror also considered it probable that the woman’s intention to matar the little girl was the father’s devenirerse. At the moment in which Sergio directed, already outside the room, he wrote: «El culpable de todo esto. Thank you”. On the inside: «Here you hold what you need, because you have achieved that I can calm my life, however go and mourn the death of my hija, of your hija Yaiza» or «thank you for being able to mate with my daughter».

During her statement, the donkey confessed that she had committed the crime because she was terrified of losing the girl; to which she stopped complaining, and accused her partner of being excessively controlling, and of claiming to be apart from the creature of her maternal family. He also asked for forgiveness and asked for forgiveness, but in the end the judge’s court ruled out that the accused moved for an insurmountable miedo, or for having had her mental faculties altered. Thus aligned with the thesis that defends both the fiscal and the abogada of the particular prosecution, Mireia Gómez here, during the first session of the juicio pointed out: «Maldad exists and it doesn’t have a gender. You are attempting to look for a psychic or psychological explanation. We have to accept that sometimes we act without foot against other people, but reality is cruel. Many people put love before love for their own children».

Related media – Linked media